lobbyTO

Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers

1088 Progress Ave

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page
Registrations naming this address
9
4 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
6
2 offices contacted
Applications at this address
3
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
Location
43.79425, -79.23522
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

9

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Top 8

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Councillor Neethan Shan3
  • Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River3
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Neethan ShanCouncillor staff3012 October 2017
Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge RiverMember of council3311 August 2017
All registrations· 9 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM24850Empire Pace (1088 Progress) Ltd.1088 Progress AvePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law15 July 2017 – 4 November 20210
SM24544Empire Pace (1088 Progress) Ltd.1088 Progress Ave.Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law11 May 2017 – 28 December 20181
SM24546Empire Pace (1088 Progress) Ltd.1088 Progress AvePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law11 May 2017 – 31 December 20185
SM24548Empire Pace (1088 Progress) Ltd.1088 Progress AvePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law11 May 2017 – 31 December 20200
SM11347Ballantry Homes Inc.1088 Progress AvePlanning Applications - Zoning by-law and site plan7 March 2008 – 19 August 20120
SM11353Ballantry (Markham Gardens) Inc.1088 Progress AvenuePlanning Act Application: Official Plan amendment, Zoning By-law amendment, Site Plan7 March 2008 – 31 December 20080
SM11351Ballantry Homes Inc.1088 Progress AvenuePlanning and Development (Official Plan, Zoning and Site Plan)6 March 2008 – 31 August 20130
SM11356Ballantry (Markham Gardens) Inc.1088 Progress AvenuePlanning and Development (Official Plan, Zoning and Site Plan)6 March 2008 – 31 March 20110
SM11391Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto1088 Progress AvenuePlanning and Development - Planning Application - Official Plan, Zoning By-law, Site Plan11 February 2008 – 11 February 20090

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

3
Data table· 3 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
A0243/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)13 July 2017Closed
Approved
A0244/17SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)13 July 2017Application Withdrawn
Withdrawn
16 150074 ESC 42 CD
Development application
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)4 May 2016Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23

3 lobbied · 32 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 23: 3 lobbied and 32 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied3Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied32Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%
Data table· 2 rows
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied28—100% (n=3)0%0%0.04
Matched, unlobbied95—100% (n=6)0%0%0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.