lobbyTO

Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin

1073 Millwood Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page
Registrations naming this address
2
2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
179
41 offices contacted
Applications at this address
1
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Location
43.70187, -79.36081
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

2

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 26 Don Valley West38
  • Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena Board36
  • Office of Councillor Jon Burnside, Ward 2624
  • Leaside Arena Board15
  • Ward 38 Scarborough Centre5
  • Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore4
  • Office of Councillor Raymond Cho, Ward 423
  • Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre3
Data table· 41 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 26 Don Valley WestMember of council381827 October 2016
Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena BoardLocal board363618 November 2015
Office of Councillor Jon Burnside, Ward 26Councillor staff241115 July 2016
Leaside Arena BoardLocal board151115 July 2016
Ward 38 Scarborough CentreMember of council5315 July 2016
Ward 6 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council4215 July 2016
Office of Councillor Raymond Cho, Ward 42Councillor staff3215 July 2016
Ward 4 Etobicoke CentreMember of council3113 July 2016
Office of Councillor Michael Thompson, Ward 37Councillor staff2015 July 2016
Office of Councillor Vincent Crisanti, Ward 1Councillor staff2215 July 2016
Office of Mayor John ToryCouncillor staff2115 July 2016
MayorMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 1 Etobicoke NorthMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 21 St. Paul'sMember of council2114 July 2016
Ward 25 Don Valley WestMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council2115 July 2016
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge RiverMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge RiverMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 43 Scarborough EastMember of council2013 July 2016
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council2013 July 2016
Office of Councillor Ana Bailao, Ward 18Councillor staff1114 July 2016
Office of Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, Ward 12Councillor staff1115 July 2016
Office of Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7Councillor staff1115 July 2016
Office of Councillor Justin DiCiano, Ward 5Councillor staff1114 July 2016
Ward 10 York CentreMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 15 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 17 DavenportMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 32 Beaches-East YorkMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 34 Don Valley EastMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 35 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 36 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 7 York WestMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 8 York WestMember of council1013 July 2016
Ward 9 York CentreMember of council1013 July 2016
All registrations· 2 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM22516Outfront Media Canada LP1073 Millwood Rd.Signs18 November 2015 – 31 December 201870
SM22497Outfront Media LLC1073 Millwood Rd.Signs17 November 2015 – 9 December 2016109

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

1
Data table· 1 row
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
11 145590 NNY 26 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)15 March 2011Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15

12 lobbied · 41 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15: 12 lobbied and 41 matched unlobbied applications in 10 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied12Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied41Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.