Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle
106 Cortleigh Blvd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Location
- 43.71354, -79.41047
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 28 November 2020 |
| Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 30 November 2020 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30903 | Paul Pathak | 106 Cortleigh Blvd. | Planning and Development Application; Minor Variance | 28 November 2020 – 18 June 2021 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 13 January 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0024/21NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 June 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0330/20NYTLAB Appeal · Refused
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0024/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 January 2021 | Closed Approved |
| A0330/20NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 June 2020 | TLAB Appeal Refused |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
106 Cortleigh Blvd · Minor variance (MV)
A0024/21NY · submitted 13 January 2021 · Closed · from registration SM30903 (Paul Pathak)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30903: Seeking approval from CofA and TLAB to allow a third floor to be built within an existing attic at 106 Cortleigh Blvd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0024/21NY at 106 Cortleigh Blvd: To permit a finished third floor in the existing attic space. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Seeking approval from CofA and TLAB to allow a third floor to be built within an existing attic at 106 Cortleigh Blvd.
Matched fields
- address
- 106 CORTLEIGH BLVD
- application_address
- 106 CORTLEIGH BLVD
106 Cortleigh Blvd · Minor variance (MV)
A0330/20NY · submitted 23 June 2020 · TLAB Appeal · from registration SM30903 (Paul Pathak)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM30903: Seeking approval from CofA and TLAB to allow a third floor to be built within an existing attic at 106 Cortleigh Blvd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0330/20NY at 106 Cortleigh Blvd: To add a livable third floor within the existing attic. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Seeking approval from CofA and TLAB to allow a third floor to be built within an existing attic at 106 Cortleigh Blvd.
Matched fields
- address
- 106 CORTLEIGH BLVD
- application_address
- 106 CORTLEIGH BLVD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 8
7 lobbied · 357 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.