Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
101 Commissioners St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.64851, -79.34394
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
9- Submitted 15 April 2021Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0047/21TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 11 March 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4732144Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 10 March 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0022/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 March 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0023/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 19 December 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 263379 STE 14 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 October 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 238507 STE 30 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 March 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0035/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 3 August 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 200896 STE 30 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 August 2016Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0051/16TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 9 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0047/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 15 April 2021 | Closed Approved |
| COA-4732144 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 11 March 2020 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| B0022/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 10 March 2020 | Closed Approved |
| B0023/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 10 March 2020 | Closed Approved |
| 19 263379 STE 14 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 238507 STE 30 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 October 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0035/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 28 March 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 16 200896 STE 30 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 3 August 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0051/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 3 August 2016 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 14
2 lobbied · 32 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 32 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.