Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
1000 Bay St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66501, -79.38764
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 14 | 4 | 25 April 2013 |
| Councillor Wong-Tam | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 9 December 2014 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM19694 | 1000 Bay Street Limited | 1000 Bay St. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 26 September 2013 – 25 September 2016 | 2 |
| SM17809 | 1000 Bay Street Limited | 1000 Bay Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 15 February 2012 – 2 November 2016 | 14 |
| SM15344 | Zack Bhatia | 1000 Bay Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 3 November 2010 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 9 December 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 262755 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 March 2015Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 15 132277 STE 27 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 September 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 246492 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 November 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 318491 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2009Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 09 199659 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 262755 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 December 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 132277 STE 27 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 25 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 246492 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 September 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 318491 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 November 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 09 199659 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
984 Bay St · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
15 132277 STE 27 CD · submitted 25 March 2015 · Closed · from registration SM19694 (1000 Bay Street Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM19694: 1000 Bay St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 132277 STE 27 CD at 984 Bay St: This Plan of Condominium application is for a standard condominium containing 458 residential units and 124 parking spaces. These units are part of a 32 storey tower, as approved by the OMB. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1000 Bay St.
Matched fields
- address
- 1000 BAY ST
- application_address
- 1000 BAY ST
984 Bay St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
12 246492 STE 27 SA · submitted 13 September 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17809 (1000 Bay Street Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM17809: 1000 Bay Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 246492 STE 27 SA at 984 Bay St: Site Plan Approval application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for the purposes of a new mixed use building., Thirty-two stories in height complete with ground floor retail, 458 dwelling units and 124 parking spaces located in a below grade parking facility. 468 Bicycle parking spaces. Ref… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1000 Bay Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1000 BAY ST
- application_address
- 1000 BAY ST
984 Bay St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
12 246492 STE 27 SA · submitted 13 September 2012 · Closed · from registration SM19694 (1000 Bay Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19694: 1000 Bay St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 246492 STE 27 SA at 984 Bay St: Site Plan Approval application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for the purposes of a new mixed use building., Thirty-two stories in height complete with ground floor retail, 458 dwelling units and 124 parking spaces located in a below grade parking facility. 468 Bicycle parking spaces. Ref… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1000 Bay St.
Matched fields
- address
- 1000 BAY ST
- application_address
- 1000 BAY ST
984 Bay St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 318491 STE 27 OZ · submitted 30 November 2011 · Closed · from registration SM17809 (1000 Bay Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17809: 1000 Bay Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 318491 STE 27 OZ at 984 Bay St: REZONING APPLICATION HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE OMB. Proposal is for a 32-storey residential tower. Associated d Site Plan Application 12 246492 STE 27 SA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1000 Bay Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1000 BAY ST
- application_address
- 1000 BAY ST
984 Bay St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 318491 STE 27 OZ · submitted 30 November 2011 · Closed · from registration SM19694 (1000 Bay Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19694: 1000 Bay St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 318491 STE 27 OZ at 984 Bay St: REZONING APPLICATION HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE OMB. Proposal is for a 32-storey residential tower. Associated d Site Plan Application 12 246492 STE 27 SA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1000 Bay St.
Matched fields
- address
- 1000 BAY ST
- application_address
- 1000 BAY ST
1000 Bay St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
09 199659 STE 27 OZ · submitted 23 December 2009 · Closed · from registration SM17809 (1000 Bay Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17809: 1000 Bay Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 199659 STE 27 OZ at 1000 Bay St: Approved by Community Council on August 17, 2010. Proposal for condo / hotel complex - 32 storeys - 99 residential units 115 hotel suites - 4 levels below grade 106 parking spaces. Application appealed to the OMB. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1000 Bay Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1000 BAY ST
- application_address
- 1000 BAY ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.