Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
100 Ranleigh Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.72853, -79.40006
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 25 Don Valley West | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 6 November 2012 |
| Office of Councillor Robinson, Ward 25 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 6 November 2012 |
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 5 November 2012 |
| Office of Councillor Filion, Ward 23 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 4 October 2012 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 5 October 2012 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM18505 | The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church | 100 Ranleigh Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 4 October 2012 – 3 October 2013 | 2 |
| SM18504 | The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church | 100 Ranleigh Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 3 October 2012 – 2 October 2013 | 4 |
| SM16726 | The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church and Bedford Park Seniors Residence | 100 Ranleigh Avenue. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 6 July 2011 – 23 April 2014 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 30 August 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 249601 NNY 25 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 August 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 249603 NNY 25 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 December 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 228410 NNY 25 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 December 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 228601 NNY 25 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 249601 NNY 25 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 August 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 249603 NNY 25 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 August 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 228410 NNY 25 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 228601 NNY 25 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
100 Ranleigh Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 249601 NNY 25 OZ · submitted 30 August 2010 · Closed · from registration SM16726 (The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church and Bedford Park Seniors Residence)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16726: Permit a mixed-use development including seniors housing and community space (including a place of worship) on the property municipally known as 100 Ranleigh Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 249601 NNY 25 OZ at 100 Ranleigh Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 4-storey apartment building with 46 dwelling units for seniors with the ground floor multi-purpose space for place of worship and community program purposes, and accessory office space. A total of 46 parking spaces and 1 loading space to be provided i… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …pment including seniors housing and community space (including a place of worship) on the property municipally known as 100 Ranleigh Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
100 Ranleigh Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 249601 NNY 25 OZ · submitted 30 August 2010 · Closed · from registration SM18504 (The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18504: Development applications to permit the redevelopment of 100 Ranleigh Avenue with a seniors residence. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 249601 NNY 25 OZ at 100 Ranleigh Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 4-storey apartment building with 46 dwelling units for seniors with the ground floor multi-purpose space for place of worship and community program purposes, and accessory office space. A total of 46 parking spaces and 1 loading space to be provided i… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development applications to permit the redevelopment of 100 Ranleigh Avenue with a seniors residence.
Matched fields
- address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
100 Ranleigh Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 249601 NNY 25 OZ · submitted 30 August 2010 · Closed · from registration SM18505 (The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18505: Development applications to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 100 Ranleigh Avenue with a seniors residence. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 249601 NNY 25 OZ at 100 Ranleigh Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 4-storey apartment building with 46 dwelling units for seniors with the ground floor multi-purpose space for place of worship and community program purposes, and accessory office space. A total of 46 parking spaces and 1 loading space to be provided i… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development applications to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 100 Ranleigh Avenue with a seniors residence.
Matched fields
- address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
100 Ranleigh Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
10 249603 NNY 25 SA · submitted 30 August 2010 · Closed · from registration SM16726 (The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church and Bedford Park Seniors Residence)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16726: Permit a mixed-use development including seniors housing and community space (including a place of worship) on the property municipally known as 100 Ranleigh Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 249603 NNY 25 SA at 100 Ranleigh Ave: Revised proposal: to permit a 4-storey apartment building with 46 dwelling units for seniors with the ground floor multi-purpose space for place of worship and community program purposes, and accessory office space. A total of 46 parking spaces and 1 loading space to be provided in an internal park… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …pment including seniors housing and community space (including a place of worship) on the property municipally known as 100 Ranleigh Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
100 Ranleigh Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
10 249603 NNY 25 SA · submitted 30 August 2010 · Closed · from registration SM18504 (The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18504: Development applications to permit the redevelopment of 100 Ranleigh Avenue with a seniors residence. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 249603 NNY 25 SA at 100 Ranleigh Ave: Revised proposal: to permit a 4-storey apartment building with 46 dwelling units for seniors with the ground floor multi-purpose space for place of worship and community program purposes, and accessory office space. A total of 46 parking spaces and 1 loading space to be provided in an internal park… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development applications to permit the redevelopment of 100 Ranleigh Avenue with a seniors residence.
Matched fields
- address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
100 Ranleigh Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
10 249603 NNY 25 SA · submitted 30 August 2010 · Closed · from registration SM18505 (The Trustees of Bedford Park United Church)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18505: Development applications to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 100 Ranleigh Avenue with a seniors residence. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 249603 NNY 25 SA at 100 Ranleigh Ave: Revised proposal: to permit a 4-storey apartment building with 46 dwelling units for seniors with the ground floor multi-purpose space for place of worship and community program purposes, and accessory office space. A total of 46 parking spaces and 1 loading space to be provided in an internal park… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development applications to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 100 Ranleigh Avenue with a seniors residence.
Matched fields
- address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
- application_address
- 100 RANLEIGH AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 10% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 25% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.