Address · Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
100 Parkway Forest Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Location
- 43.77333, -79.34190
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
11- Submitted 27 November 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 267829 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 September 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 238510 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 December 2016Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 16 270214 NNY 33 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 November 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 255115 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 September 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 230503 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 August 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 209904 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 June 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 179745 NNY 33 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 May 2014Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 14 155987 NNY 33 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 November 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 269119 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 January 2013Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 13 111476 NNY 33 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 January 2013Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 13 111486 NNY 33 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 11 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 267829 NNY 33 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 November 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 238510 NNY 33 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 September 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 270214 NNY 33 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 22 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 255115 NNY 33 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 November 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 230503 NNY 33 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 September 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 209904 NNY 33 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 August 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 179745 NNY 33 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 June 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 155987 NNY 33 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 13 May 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 269119 NNY 33 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 November 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 111476 NNY 33 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 25 January 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 111486 NNY 33 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 25 January 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17
14 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.