Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
100 Adelaide St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64979, -79.38248
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 7 | 3 | 8 March 2017 |
| Pam McConnell | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 31 May 2017 |
| Councillor Shiner | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 2 August 2017 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 28 March 2013 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 4 | 3 | 13 April 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Pam McConnell Ward 28 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 28 March 2013 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 14 May 2013 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 20 March 2017 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23730 | Ernst & Young LLP | 100 Adelaide Street West | By-law / Regulation; Signs | 21 November 2016 – 30 June 2018 | 4 |
| SM23626 | Ernst & Young LLP | 100 Adelaide Street West | Signs | 19 October 2016 – 21 February 2018 | 17 |
| SM19134 | Oxford Properties Group | 100 Adelaide St. W. | Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 28 March 2013 – 26 March 2014 | 1 |
| SM19151 | Oxford Properties Group | 100 Adelaide Street West | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 28 March 2013 – 29 March 2013 | 1 |
| SM19137 | OPGI Management GP Inc. | 100 Adelaide Street West | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Official P… | 26 March 2013 – 22 August 2014 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 27 December 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 298093 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 298093 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 December 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.