10 Eva Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 2; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 3; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Location: 43.64135, -79.56277
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Deltera Inc.SM30331 · 1 July 20202

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre	Member of council	2	0	13 July 2020

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM30331	Deltera Inc.	10 Eva Road	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla…	1 July 2020 – 31 December 2026	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 19 January 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 105435 WET 02 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 14 September 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 232906 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 21 February 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 112855 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 3 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
22 105435 WET 02 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	19 January 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
17 232906 WET 03 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	14 September 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
08 112855 WET 03 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	21 February 2008	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 2

1 lobbied · 1 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 2: 1 lobbied and 1 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched