Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
1 Snooker St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.63927, -79.42006
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 5 October 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 243666 STE 19 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 March 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 130831 STE 19 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 March 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 128794 STE 19 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 243666 STE 19 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 October 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 130831 STE 19 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 March 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 128794 STE 19 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 14 March 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1 Snooker St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 128794 STE 19 OZ · submitted 14 March 2014 · Closed · from registration SM17690 (Kevric Real Estate)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17690: ZBA, OPA apps for 99 Atlantic Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 128794 STE 19 OZ at 1 Snooker St: Proposed renovations and adaptive reuse of the existing buildings on the property for office uses with retail and services commercial use at the lower levels. Two new building are proposed within the existing surface parking lot areas, including a 8-storey office building with retail and service co… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA, OPA apps for 99 Atlantic Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 99 ATLANTIC AVE
- application_address
- 99 ATLANTIC AVE
1 Snooker St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 128794 STE 19 OZ · submitted 14 March 2014 · Closed · from registration SM17699 (Kevric Real Estate)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17699: ZBA, OPA apps for 99 Atlantic Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 128794 STE 19 OZ at 1 Snooker St: Proposed renovations and adaptive reuse of the existing buildings on the property for office uses with retail and services commercial use at the lower levels. Two new building are proposed within the existing surface parking lot areas, including a 8-storey office building with retail and service co… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA, OPA apps for 99 Atlantic Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 99 ATLANTIC AVE
- application_address
- 99 ATLANTIC AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.