Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
1 Kyle Lowry Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Location
- 43.72065, -79.34541
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 16 August 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 206988 NNY 16 SANOAC Issued · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 206988 NNY 16 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 August 2019 | NOAC Issued Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
844 Don Mills Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 206988 NNY 16 SA · submitted 16 August 2019 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM27646 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27646: RE the development of 1150 Eglinton Ave. East and 844 Don Mills Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 206988 NNY 16 SA at 844 Don Mills Rd: This is the first application (Blocks 1A & 1B) for Site Plan Control related to the redevelopment of the former Celestica lands, now known as Crosstown. This application proposes the construction of a nine storey office building having a daycare, retail uses at-grade, and a connection to the future… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: RE the development of 1150 Eglinton Ave. East and 844 Don Mills Rd.
- particulars: RE the development of 1150 Eglinton Ave. East and 844 Don Mills Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 844 DON MILLS RD
- application_address
- 844 DON MILLS RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16
10 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.