Address · Ward 22 · Nick Mantas

0 Passmore Avenue

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 45; 16 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 3; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Location: 43.81912, -79.30348
How this address was located: Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 14 PASSMORE AVE (14 civic numbers away).

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

D. Crupi and Sons LimitedSM21928 · 10 June 201542
D. Crupi and Sons LimitedSM21932 · 10 June 20153

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt8
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore6
Office of Councillor Karygiannis, Ward 393
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre3
Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge River3
Ward 9 York Centre3
Mayor's Office2
Office of Councillor Gary Crawford, Ward 362

Data table· 16 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	8	8	8 October 2015
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	6	6	8 October 2015
Office of Councillor Karygiannis, Ward 39	Councillor staff	3	3	10 September 2015
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	3	3	14 July 2015
Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge River	Member of council	3	3	22 June 2015
Ward 9 York Centre	Member of council	3	3	15 September 2015
Mayor's Office	Councillor staff	2	0	8 July 2015
Office of Councillor Gary Crawford, Ward 36	Councillor staff	2	2	28 July 2015
Office of Councillor Michelle Berardinetti,Ward 35	Councillor staff	2	2	29 July 2015
Office of Councillor Raymond Cho, Ward 42	Councillor staff	2	2	28 July 2015
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	2	2	14 September 2015
Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest	Member of council	2	2	29 July 2015
Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest	Member of council	2	2	28 July 2015
Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	2	2	13 August 2015
Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River	Member of council	2	2	28 July 2015
Office of Councillor Lee, Ward 41	Councillor staff	1	1	16 November 2015

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM21928	D. Crupi and Sons Limited	0 Passmore Avenue	Economic Development	10 June 2015 – 31 March 2017	42
SM21932	D. Crupi and Sons Limited	0 Passmore Avenue	Economic Development	10 June 2015 – 31 December 2016	3

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 30 May 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0023/25SCConditional Consent · Approved
Submitted 13 March 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0060/24SCApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
Submitted 7 August 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 177695 ESC 23 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 3 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
B0023/25SC Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	30 May 2025	Conditional Consent Approved
A0060/24SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 March 2024	Application Withdrawn Withdrawn
20 177695 ESC 23 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	7 August 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 23

4 lobbied · 13 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 4 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 23: 4 lobbied and 13 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	13	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23

3 lobbied · 32 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23: 3 lobbied and 32 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	3	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	32	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23

2 lobbied · 2 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23: 2 lobbied and 2 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.