Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
0 Caledonia Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.67571, -79.45523
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 6 CALEDONIA RD (6 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Colle | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 8 August 2023 |
| Mike Colle | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 5 September 2023 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34591 | Oxford Properties Group | 0 Caledonia Rd | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application | 26 June 2023 – 31 March 2027 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 3 May 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 140846 NNY 08 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 140846 NNY 08 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 3 May 2023 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1100 Caledonia Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
23 140846 NNY 08 SA · submitted 3 May 2023 · Under Review · from registration SM34591 (Oxford Properties Group)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34591: To set up meeting with councillor regarding site. Site plan application City of Toronto 23 140846 NNY 08 SA, regarding site located at 0, 1100, 1120-1130 & 1150 Caledonia Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 140846 NNY 08 SA at 1100 Caledonia Rd: Site Plan Approval application for two one-storey industrial buildings. The proposed buildings would accommodate warehouse uses with accessory office consisting of 43,449 square metres of gross floor area (GFA) and a floor space index (FSI) of 0.48. A total of 331 parking spaces will be provided wi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To set up meeting with councillor regarding site. Site plan application City of Toronto 23 140846 NNY 08 SA, regarding site located at 0, 1100, 1120-1130 & 1150 Caledonia Rd.
- particulars: …llor regarding site. Site plan application City of Toronto 23 140846 NNY 08 SA, regarding site located at 0, 1100, 1120-1130 & 1150 Caledonia Rd.
Matched fields
- file_number
- 23 140846 NNY 08 SA
- address
- 1130&1150 CALEDONIA RD
- application_address
- 1120-1130 CALEDONIA RD
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
1100 Caledonia Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
23 140846 NNY 08 SA · submitted 3 May 2023 · Under Review · from registration SM34668 (OPGI Management GP Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34668: 1100, 1120-1130 & 1150 Caledonia Rd (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 140846 NNY 08 SA at 1100 Caledonia Rd: Site Plan Approval application for two one-storey industrial buildings. The proposed buildings would accommodate warehouse uses with accessory office consisting of 43,449 square metres of gross floor area (GFA) and a floor space index (FSI) of 0.48. A total of 331 parking spaces will be provided wi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1100, 1120-1130 & 1150 Caledonia Rd
Matched fields
- address
- 1130&1150 CALEDONIA RD
- application_address
- 1120-1130 CALEDONIA RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 69 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.